Experts: Trump Strikes Iran and Venezuela, Waiting for the Chinese Communist Party to Collapse

During “Operation Epic Fury,” a U.S. Navy pilot taxis an aircraft to the staging point on the flight deck of the Nimitz-class aircraft carrier USS Abraham Lincoln

[People News] U.S. military operations against the pro-Chinese Communist Party regimes in Venezuela and Iran have dealt a blow to the Chinese Communist Party. An Israeli expert said that U.S. President Trump’s goal is to cause the Chinese Communist Party regime behind them to disintegrate and collapse.

Trump is destroying the old order built by the Chinese Communist Party

Adam Scott Bellos, founder and CEO of The Israel Innovation Fund (TIIF), published a commentary article in The Jerusalem Post titled “The oxygen war: The new order China never expected.”

The article points out that geopolitics is like a system of pipelines. Change that system of pipelines, and you change everything that depends on it: money, alliances, ideologies, and the speed at which regimes operate.

The Chinese Communist Party and other of the world’s worst political systems thought they could indefinitely “manage” things through half-hearted sanctions and statements. But the new order is ruthless: it depends on pricing. Cut off cheap oxygen—oil revenue, sanctions-evasion channels, and undefended choke points—and those regimes that rely on the old order to survive will not only totter, but suffocate to death.

The article says that the sharpest part of Trump and Rubio’s worldview is that it is not focused on treating symptoms while ignoring root causes, but on destroying the entire network system, a system that includes ports connected to refineries, oil tankers connected to shell companies, and ideology connected to cash.

Their target is not merely Iran or Venezuela, but to raise the operating costs of Tehran, Caracas, Moscow, and their backer—the Chinese Communist Party—to an unbearable level, and then sit and wait for them to disintegrate and collapse.

The United States is leading the new energy battlefield

The article says that after Venezuelan dictator Maduro was captured alive by the United States, the most notable change was not in rhetoric, but in logistics. Venezuela’s total oil exports in February were about 737,000 barrels per day. The most noteworthy change was in direction: exports to China fell sharply, while exports to the United States and Europe surged, with U.S.-authorized traders dominating the oil flow.

For many years, the Chinese Communist Party not only bought Venezuelan crude oil, but also guaranteed the Venezuelan regime by acting as the buyer of last resort. When this channel tightens, Venezuela loses not only revenue, but also time, bargaining leverage, and the illusion that Beijing can always take it under its wing.

Other countries are beginning to watch closely and reassess the situation, because once the Chinese Communist Party’s protective measures “look dispensable,” all clients will begin to scrutinize those “loyalty clauses” carefully.

Next comes Iran, the Islamic Republic that turned ideology into leverage by exploiting geography and selling regional instability. Yet in just a few days, the U.S.-Israel allied forces completely destroyed Iran’s energy system. Iran announced the closure of the Strait of Hormuz, insurance companies canceled war-risk coverage, and oil tankers began avoiding the route.

The article says that modern warfare does not need to conquer territory in order to change established assumptions. It only needs to make old shipping routes unaffordable. When the world’s most important exporters are forced to reroute immediately, what you are seeing is not regional unrest, but the global economy beginning to reshape its lifelines.

The Chinese Communist Party’s lifeline is being dismantled

The article writes that now let us turn the camera to where it really belongs: the Chinese Communist Party. Beijing is the central bank of authoritarian systems, “not because it likes anyone,” but because it can buy things other countries cannot touch and finance projects that others cannot insure.

The article says that the Chinese Communist Party buys more than 80% of Iran’s oil exports, often at extremely low prices, allowing refiners willing to engage in backroom dealings to profit from sanctioned oil. This relationship is Tehran’s external lifeline and Beijing’s leverage: cheap energy and strategic influence.

But when exports become unstable and choke points become battlefields, the discount is no longer a bargain, but a burden. Beijing has already signaled in its own way that it will take measures to safeguard its energy supply.

Of course, Beijing is not helpless. Analysts point out that the Chinese Communist Party has already built a series of buffer mechanisms, including reserves, price controls, and excess supply, allowing it to resist short-term shocks with unusual effectiveness and even profit by exporting refined products while other countries scramble to buy them. But that is precisely the trap: “short-term resilience may conceal long-term risks.”

The article emphasizes that the Chinese Communist Party’s strategy of transfusing blood to sanctioned regimes through ambiguity will isolate it globally. This isolation is not always openly declared; sometimes it takes shape gradually.

China-Russia relations are being severely tested

The article points out that China and Russia are closely linked by the need for survival, but that need is not loyalty, it is pressure. If Beijing’s isolation ultimately turns into a burden on all surrounding countries, Moscow will be forced to make a quiet and cold calculation: continue being a vassal of the Chinese Communist Party, or become the first major country to break out of its orbit.

The article states that this is not a war against the people, but a conflict between different systems. Western democratic systems are built on certain deep-rooted beliefs: that human life has intrinsic value, that dissent is not treason, and that the individual is not the property of the state.

By contrast, communism, fascism, and Islamism all view people as “fuel” for revolution, empire, myth, and the survival of rulers. They suppress dissent and outsource violence, but they are not truly stable. These regimes rely on cheap energy, sanctions loopholes, and hidden financiers who profit from chaos in order to keep operating. Now that era is nearing its end.

The article concludes that the Chinese Communist Party built an empire propped up by discounts and ambiguity, a world in which it could buy oil that everyone else sanctioned while calling itself “neutral.” But the new “oxygen war” does not care what you call yourself. It only cares who pays the bill after the pipelines collapse. “In the coming world, Beijing will only pay the price.” △