Opposing the CCP's Atrocities Does Not Mean Betraying the Motherland

Signed petitions for the ‘End CCP’ initiative, filling up a small cart. (Provided by the Tuidang Centre)

[People News] In recent years, there have been ongoing attempts to equate 'anti-communism' with 'anti-China', and to label those who oppose the CCP's atrocities as 'traitors' and 'national sellouts'. This tactic of concept substitution is not only despicable but also foolish. In reality, the opposite is true: the real betrayers of the motherland are not the overseas Chinese who expose the CCP's atrocities, but the CCP itself, which has been heavily influenced by Russian blood since its inception, has self-alienated for a century, and continuously sells out national interests.

The CCP is not synonymous with China.

Mr Shi Ping serves as an excellent example. Born in Beijing and having lived in Japan for decades, this scholar has authored over a dozen insightful books analysing the CCP in Japanese, earning him the title of 'the Chinese who understands China the most' among Japanese readers. He fiercely criticises the tyranny of the CCP while simultaneously expressing a deep love for Chinese culture and holding great hope for the future of Chinese civilisation. He has often choked up during broadcasts, stating: 'What I oppose is only the CCP, not China. What I hope to see is a China without the Communist Party.' Can this be considered a betrayal of the motherland? Clearly, this is a manifestation of great love.

Mr Yu Maochun is similarly positioned. Born in Anhui and formerly serving as the chief advisor on China policy at the U.S. State Department, he is deeply hated by the CCP, with his parents being interrogated in China and his childhood home being destroyed. Nevertheless, he has no regrets. He consistently emphasises that the CCP does not represent China, and that the Chinese people are not the slaves of the CCP. It is precisely because of his love for China that he seeks to reveal the true nature of the CCP to the world and assist the free world in formulating policies that target the CCP, rather than China itself. Is this considered selling out the country? This is a matter of righteousness.

Those who label individuals like Shi Ping and Yu Maochun as 'traitors' are either mentally unstable or have received funding from the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). They intentionally blur the lines between the CCP and China, using nationalism as a facade, driven by a fear of the truth being revealed.

The harsh reality is this: since its inception, the CCP has functioned as a branch established by the Soviet Union in the Far East.

In 1920, the Communist International dispatched Vyacheslav Molotov to China, equipped with Soviet funding and directives to directly form the Chinese Communist Party. During the First National Congress of the CCP in 1921, representatives from the Communist International, including Maring and Nikolsky, were present throughout the event, overseeing the proceedings. The resolution adopted at the Second National Congress of the CCP in 1922, titled 'Resolution on the CCP's Joining the Third International,' explicitly states: 'The Chinese Communist Party is a part of the Communist International, designated as the 'Chinese Communist Party,' serving as a branch of the Communist International.' 

This is clear-cut, undeniable evidence. The CCP officially became a Far Eastern branch of the Communist International under Soviet control, with early leaders such as Chen Duxiu, Qu Qiubai, Wang Ming, and Bo Gu being nearly all agents nurtured by the Soviet Union and appointed by the Communist International. Following the failure of the Great Revolution, the CCP fully complied with Stalin's directives, establishing the 'Chinese Soviet Republic' in Jiangxi, which featured a national flag with the hammer and sickle and adopted 'The Internationale' as its national anthem, openly declaring its goal to overthrow 'all imperialist rule in China.' What else could this be if not a colonial regime of the Soviet Union?

During the Anti-Japanese War, Mao Zedong publicly declared in Yan'an: 'Some people ask, what should we do if Communist Party members do not love their country? We are internationalists, and our slogan is to unite the proletarians of the world, so we do not advocate for patriotism.' (Page 345 of 'Mao Zedong's Chronology') Wang Ming even suggested that 'everything should go through the united front, and everything should obey the united front,' which essentially means that all actions should serve the interests of the Soviet Union, steering the anti-Japanese forces towards Soviet control.

What legitimacy does such an organisation have to represent China? What right does it have to label its opponents as 'anti-China'?

The true betrayers of the motherland are the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) itself.

It obliterated 5,000 years of traditional Chinese culture during the Cultural Revolution; it disrupted countless Chinese family lineages through its family planning policies; it wasted the hard-earned money of 1.4 billion Chinese people to support foreign dictators via the Belt and Road Initiative; it ceded vast territories to Russia and North Korea while telling the citizens 'not an inch of land will be surrendered'; it turned Hong Kong from a jewel of the East into a police state; it engaged in genocidal persecution in Xinjiang and destroyed a millennia-old Buddhist culture in Tibet... which of these actions is not treasonous?

If today's Chinese people still cannot differentiate between 'CCP' and 'China,' that is the true national tragedy.

Shi Ping and Yu Maochun have demonstrated through their actions that opposing the atrocities of the CCP is not a betrayal of the motherland, but rather a means of atonement for the country and the nation.

Only by dismantling this evil branch left by the Soviet Union can China truly rise.

True patriots have never feared being called 'traitors' by the CCP. Because we understand that history will ultimately reveal: the most treacherous party has always been the CCP itself.

(Source: Author X Account) △