On September 14, a parade was held in New York to support the 430 million Chinese people who have withdrawn from the CCP, the Communist Youth League, and the Young Pioneers. (Zhang Jingyi / Global Service Center for Quitting the CCP)
[People News] This year marks the 20th anniversary of the publication of the Nine Commentaries on the Communist Party by Dajiyuna. After its publication, the Nine Commentaries sparked a global wave of withdrawals from the CCP, the Youth League, and the Young Pioneers, known as the "Three Withdrawals."
How should the "Three Withdrawals" wave triggered by the Nine Commentaries be viewed? Some people, without understanding the essence, often dismiss it as anti-communism or political activism, instinctively feeling repelled by it.
As a former official of the Central Commission for Discipline Inspection and someone who was immersed in CCP culture for 52 years, I can understand this reaction. However, I must say that it is a misunderstanding.
First of all, the Nine Commentaries on the Communist Party was not written based on the logic of party culture. Instead, it steps outside the framework of party culture and is written from the perspective of traditional values that have stood the test of time and universal values shared by all humanity. Its examination of the Communist Party seeks to trace the truth and thoroughly analyze its essence, aiming to let people, including every CCP member, Youth League member, and Young Pioneer, understand what the Communist Party truly is.
What is the Communist Party? Many CCP members spend their entire lives without figuring it out, even until their death.
For example, Jian Bozan, a renowned Marxist historian in China, spent his life studying Marxism and history and was a first-class professor at Peking University, the most prestigious university in China. Logically, Jian Bozan should have understood what the Communist Party truly is, but he didn’t even know at the time of his death.
On a cold winter night on December 19, 1968, two years after the start of the Cultural Revolution, Jian Bozan and his wife, Dai Shuwan, committed suicide by taking an overdose of sleeping pills.
The next day, a note was found in Jian Bozan’s right jacket pocket, which read, "I truly cannot confess, so I am taking this final step. My choice of this path has nothing to do with Comrade Du.” Comrade Du was the retired worker responsible for “watching over” the couple. In his left jacket pocket was another note, with "Long live Chairman Mao!" written three times.
What was Jian Bozan unable to confess? He was unable to provide evidence that former Chinese President Liu Shaoqi had once been a “traitor.”
Who wanted Liu Shaoqi overthrown during the Cultural Revolution? It was Mao Zedong, the very person Jian Bozan hailed as “Chairman Mao” three times before his death.
Why did Mao want to overthrow Liu Shaoqi? Mao believed he was the “supreme commander” of the “proletarian headquarters,” while Liu was the commander of the “bourgeois headquarters” and the “biggest capitalist in power within the Party,” who needed to be overthrown.
To overthrow Liu Shaoqi, Mao needed to find evidence of his "crimes." Mao’s wife, Jiang Qing, deputy head of the Central Cultural Revolution Group, led a team that sought proof that Liu had once been a “traitor.” They eventually found Jian Bozan.
In 1935, when Liu Shaoqi represented the CCP in negotiations with the Nationalist Party (KMT), Jian Bozan was one of the intermediaries.
Jian Bozan racked his brain but could not recall any instance where Liu Shaoqi acted as a "traitor" during the negotiations. However, Wu Zhong, the deputy head of the investigation team, repeatedly demanded that Jian confess. If he didn’t, he would be arrested and imprisoned. According to some recollections, Wu Zhong made this threat with a gun to Jian Bozan's head.
Unable to provide the fabricated evidence required to label Liu Shaoqi a "traitor" and unwilling to falsely accuse him, Jian Bozan chose to end his life.
Mao Zedong was the true mastermind behind Liu Shaoqi's downfall during the Cultural Revolution. It was Mao who labeled Liu with false accusations of being a “traitor, spy, and labor union traitor” and caused his death.
Yet, before his death, Jian Bozan wrote notes proclaiming “Long live Chairman Mao” three times, showing loyalty to Mao. Was this clarity or confusion?
Jian Bozan and his wife's suicides were, in fact, the result of being driven to death by the Communist Party.
However, even up to his death, Jian Bozan never realized that the great, glorious, and correct Communist Party that he once admired, pursued, joined, and praised, would drive him to his death.
Was Mao Zedong truly the “supreme commander of the proletarian headquarters”? Was Liu Shaoqi the “commander of the bourgeois headquarters”? Was Mao the “great socialist leader within the Party”? Was Liu Shaoqi the “biggest capitalist in power within the Party”? Was Liu a “traitor, spy, and labor union traitor”?
Until the moment of his death, Jian Bozan did not have answers to these questions and died in confusion.
In reality, terms like “proletariat,” “bourgeoisie,” “socialism,” “capitalism,” and accusations like “traitor, spy, labor union traitor” were all labels created by the CCP’s party culture, and they were all false.
Mao Zedong launched the Cultural Revolution, sparing no effort and using all means to overthrow Liu Shaoqi. This was an act of evil.
Mao Zedong’s campaign to mobilize the entire Party, military, and nation to denounce Liu Shaoqi was part of his philosophy of “fighting against the heavens, fighting against the earth, and fighting against people” and his joy in such conflicts.
The Nine Commentaries on the Communist Party exposes the labels, decorations, and deceptive language used by the CCP, clearly pointing out that the Communist Party is not normal; it is a “specter from the West” or “communist evil spirit.” The Communist Party is, in essence, a cult characterized by “falsehood, evil, strife, defiance of heaven, earth, humanity, and divinity.”
Chinese tradition says, “One without a sense of right and wrong is not human.”
The Nine Commentaries on the Communist Party is an extraordinary work that clarifies the right and wrong of the Communist Party. It reveals the true nature of the CCP, known for its disguises.
Many who read the Nine Commentaries experience an epiphany: “Oh, so that’s what the Communist Party is.”
In the 20 years since the publication of the Nine Commentaries, I have continuously conducted empirical and historical research on the CCP, both in China and abroad. My conclusion is:
The CCP is the world’s largest party of lies, the most unethical and lawless party, the most aggressive party, the party that has killed the most people, the biggest traitor party, the most destructive to traditional culture, the largest state terrorism party, and the most corrupt party globally.
These conclusions prove that the Nine Commentaries on the Communist Party accurately describes the nature of the Communist Party.
The communist specter harms not only ordinary people but also high-ranking CCP officials.
Take Xi Jinping as an example. His father, Xi Zhongxun, was targeted by the Communist Party three times:
The first time was in October 1935, when Xi Zhongxun, then Chairman of the Shaanxi-Gansu Soviet Government, was accused of being a “counter-revolutionary leader” during the CCP’s “Shaanbei Purge” and was almost buried alive.
The second time was in September 1962, when Xi Zhongxun, then Vice Premier and Secretary-General of the State Council, was accused by Mao Zedong of “using a novel to oppose the Party” and labeled the “leader of an anti-Party clique,” enduring 16 years of persecution.
The third time was in October 1990, when Xi Zhongxun, then Vice Chairman of the National People’s Congress, was “dismissed” and sent to Shenzhen due to differing opinions with Deng Xiaoping on significant issues.
These three incidents show that Xi Zhongxun was repeatedly targeted by the CCP, which operated under the manipulation of the communist specter promoting “falsehood, evil, and strife.”
As Vice Chairman of the National People’s Congress, Xi Zhongxun once reflected, “I have long pondered how to protect different opinions. Looking at the Party’s history, the disasters caused by differing opinions are immense. Terms like ‘anti-Party alliance,’ ‘counter-revolutionary group,’ ‘rightist capitulation,’ and ‘leftist opportunism’ have appeared dozens or even hundreds of times in my experience, but investigations often showed that these were simply different ideas, often correct ones... I wonder if a ‘Different Opinions Protection Law’ could be established to allow the expression of differing views without punishment, even if those views are wrong.”
On October 30, 1990, the day before being “dismissed,” Xi Zhongxun spoke at a National People’s Congress Standing Committee meeting, urging that those with differing opinions not be regarded as “opposition” or “reactionary,” and emphasizing the importance of protecting and studying different views.
Though Xi Zhongxun was a committed CCP member, he retained some human decency. His views align with normal human thinking and logic but do not align with the CCP’s “political rules” of maintaining ideological conformity with the Party Central Committee, resulting in his early removal.
After Xi Jinping became General Secretary of the CCP in 2012, it would have been logical for him to reflect on the reasons for his father’s repeated targeting, learn from history, and avoid repeating past mistakes. He should have realized his father’s wish to “protect different opinions.”
However, in the 12 years since coming to power, Xi has done the opposite.
Why?
Because Xi has not recognized the true nature of the CCP or deeply understood its history of violence, leading to continuous misjudgments under the influence of the communist specter, plunging the CCP into an unprecedented comprehensive crisis.
Today, Xi stands on the edge of a cliff.
If Xi had seriously read the Nine Commentaries on the Communist Party, truly understood what the CCP is, and used a pseudonym to withdraw from the Party, the Youth League, and the Young Pioneers, severing ties with the blood-stained CCP and rejecting atheism to embrace traditional Chinese beliefs in divine beings, he would receive divine protection and not be in such a dangerous situation today.
Why do some people label the Nine Commentaries on the Communist Party as anti-communist? The main reason is that they view it through the lens of party culture, which emphasizes a philosophy of struggle. The CCP’s 75-year reign has ingrained a combative habit in those influenced by party culture, intolerant of differing or opposing views. When they encounter perspectives different from CCP ideology, they instinctively label them as anti-Party or anti-communist.
As mentioned earlier, the Nine Commentaries on the Communist Party was not written from the perspective of party culture but guided by traditional and universal values. Its purpose is to reveal the truth about the CCP and save those deceived by its lies. It is not against the CCP, nor against CCP members, Youth League members, or Young Pioneers, but seeks to tell people the true nature of the Communist Party.
Once people recognize the CCP’s nature of “falsehood, evil, strife, defiance of heaven, earth, humanity, and divinity,” they can choose between good and evil. Withdrawing from the Party, the Youth League, and the Young Pioneers is choosing goodness over evil, distancing oneself from danger, and choosing a bright and hopeful future.
As mentioned earlier, the CCP is the party that has killed the most people in the world. What does this mean? It means the CCP has the most blood debts globally.
Repaying debts is a natural law.
The CCP, having killed so many and accrued so many blood debts, cannot simply walk away without consequences. That is impossible.
The principle of retribution for good and evil is a heavenly law.
Now, the CCP has reached the historical stage of “Heaven’s destruction of the CCP,” and a great reckoning, cleansing, and elimination of the CCP’s evildoers is imminent.
Before this judgment, cleansing, and elimination arrive, withdrawing from the CCP, the Youth League, and the Young Pioneers is the best way to save oneself and others.
According to Dajiyuan's Tuidang (Quitting the CCP) website, 438 million Chinese people have declared their withdrawal from the CCP, the Youth League, and the Young Pioneers.
On the 20th anniversary of the Nine Commentaries on the Communist Party, I urge those Chinese who still have not made the “Three Withdrawals” but retain their conscience to take the time to read the Nine Commentaries on the Communist Party, understand right from wrong, distinguish between good and evil, and recognize righteousness and wickedness. For yourself, your family, and your descendants, make the “Three Withdrawals” now. Only then can you enter a free China without the CCP under divine protection.
(Reprinted from Dajiyuan)
News magazine bootstrap themes!
I like this themes, fast loading and look profesional
Thank you Carlos!
You're welcome!
Please support me with give positive rating!
Yes Sure!