Tian Hairong Forces Yu Menglong Into a Dead End; True Culprit in Framing Military Descendant Exposed

Aa slogan on a car in Shanghai: “Fight for justice, the world’s best youth—Yu Menglong.”(Video screenshot)

[People News] As of December 6, the global number of joint-signatures has reached 716,000. However, netizens have noticed that the pace of signatures has become increasingly slow. Some attentive netizens reminded that after signing the petition, an email will be sent to the mailbox you used to sign for Yu Menglong. You must open the email and click “verify”; only then will the petition be valid. Otherwise, the signature is invalid. Netizens speculate that many people do not know this step, which is one of the reasons why the signature count is not increasing quickly. So we remind netizens not to forget this step, so the global petition count can break one million as soon as possible.

In recent times, because many people spoke out for Yu Menglong, netizens from all over mainland China have been summoned by the Public Security Bureau for “tea talks.” Netizens share their experiences of these sessions. One netizen said police called twice, but she missed the calls. Then three police officers came directly to her door. She said that many people are afraid when facing the police for the first time, but from that moment on, they see everything clearly and realize that all of this is tacitly approved by Xi Dada.

One netizen said she really was afraid at the time—not of something happening to herself, but afraid they would harm her family. She wondered whether Menglong also had to endure because of concerns for his family.

In fact, this is one of the Communist Party’s most commonly used rogue tactics: if they cannot threaten you, they will use your soft spot and threaten your family, forcing you to give up. If you still refuse, they will shift the blame of “implicating your family” onto you, causing uninformed family members to resent you.

For dissidents, rights defenders, Falun Gong practitioners and other groups in mainland China, because they persist in justice and conscience, continue to speak up for kindness, and refuse to abandon their belief, they are arrested, sentenced, tortured, and even subjected to live organ harvesting by the CCP. This has caused countless families to be torn apart. But the CCP reverses black and white, producing public opinion claiming these people are stubborn, disregard their families, abandon affection, and walk an “evil path.” In reality, isn’t the CCP regime the true culprit behind all of this? Aren’t they the ones who created countless wrongful cases? If the government truly solved problems for the people instead of trying to silence those who raise the problems, would these family tragedies have happened?

Just like now, the CCP blocks all voices calling for truth for Yu Menglong across all social media platforms, sealing off every channel of appeal. But what wrong did Yu Menglong or the netizens commit?

Though the road ahead is rough, good news continues to emerge. One netizen wanted to share information to encourage others but feared her video would be deleted, so she had to speak in English. She said that when she went to the post office to mail letters, the postal worker told her that many people were now sending letters to Beijing, and the stamps were about to be sold out. She had gone to this post office eight times before, and this was the first time she heard such feedback. She believed this was good news, showing that despite harsh suppression, account bans, and communication blocks, many people still persist in sending “pigeon letters.” Yes—when netizens gather, they are a blazing fire; when scattered, they are still stars across the sky. One star is faint, but all the stars together become countless beams of light.

A netizen in Shanghai spray-painted a slogan on his car: “Fight for justice, the world’s best youth—Yu Menglong.” He drove fearlessly through the busy Shanghai streets, becoming a bright landscape and a shining star fighting for Yu Menglong.

Another piece of good news: Mango Super Media’s stock closed at 24.21 yuan per share on December 3. On December 4, it fell again to 23.94. Mango Super Media has dropped for four consecutive days, with a cumulative decline of 7.68%. Since the Yu Menglong incident, Mango Super Media’s market value has evaporated by more than 10 billion yuan.

Netizens joked: “The green color is pleasing to the eyes. When you’re in a bad mood, look at it and you’ll feel better. It must fall. Fall until it collapses. When the evil falls, the sky will brighten!” Overseas netizens praised mainland netizens, saying that this time their persistence and action are truly impressive.

Some netizens said: “I used to love Hunan TV so much. Every time I turned on the TV, that’s what I watched. But these past months, once the mask was torn off, look how rotten it is now. Everything already destined your downfall.”

Sharp-eyed netizens found that the evildoers are preparing to change the stock name, but the stock code cannot be changed. Put on a vest and it’s still a turtle.

Below are the “evil stocks” and their codes listed by netizens:
Mango Super Media: 300413
Qixing Group: 002371
Qihe Xingye: 600258
Jiguang Technology: 688696
Fang Li-Laolei Group: 300065
Netizens remind everyone to remember these stock codes.

Upon seeing this good news, netizens cheered: “最好一直跌，跌到5块，5分钱，跌到当废纸！” (“It’s best if it keeps dropping, falls to 5 yuan, 5 cents, drops until it’s worthless!”)

Earlier, Mango Super Media injected capital to stabilize the stock price and even mocked netizens online, saying things like “You only talk big,” and “I don’t see how far this stock has fallen. Tian Hairong’s movie is still showing! And that veteran who spoke out was dealt with by us.”

Unexpectedly, netizens proved to have both intelligence and capability. Within a few days, Mango Super Media’s stock fell again. The “veteran” they referenced is Lin Beichuan, the military descendant who consistently spoke up for Yu Menglong. After being missing for nearly 20 days, he suddenly faced cyberbullying and smearing. Authorities gave him two choices:

1. Lower his head and sign—essentially invalidating all netizens’ efforts over the past two months;

2. Or be recalled to the military and sent to the most dangerous border regions with life-threatening risks.

In the end, Lin Beichuan chose to be recalled. Mango Super Media exposed its own ugliness, admitting they had plotted to remove him.

Furthermore, Tian Hairong’s new film My World Without Me triggered widespread boycotts despite her emotional promotional efforts. Netizens said: “Act with your conscience; remember those who have left.” After release, it was accused of box-office fraud and was taken down after only six days.

Tian Hairong’s film My World Without Me was taken down after six days. (Online photo)

A Shanghai netizen found that multiple central Shanghai cinemas had extremely poor ticket sales for the film. But a suburban cinema in Chuansha showed an unbelievable situation: two showings after 10 p.m. were fully booked. Another cinema showed a full house after 11:30 p.m.

A netizen in Shenyang observed three cinemas where every showing had exactly 16 tickets sold—a strange pattern—while other cinemas had completely empty seats. One netizen went to a showing only to discover the theater was empty—ghost screenings. Yet the film still reported a total box office of 10 million yuan. If no one watched it, who paid that 10 million?

Netizens directly declared that Tian Hairong must be laundering money. Using fake box office numbers to launder money is common in China’s entertainment industry. Dirty money is turned into legal company profits through reported box office revenue.

At the film premiere, Tian Hairong cried and pleaded: “I just want to be a filmmaker. Let the audience judge. Don’t boycott. Don’t ban me. I don’t represent anyone.” Despite trying every possible method, she still faced complete failure.

This proves that the box office is no longer something capital can fully control. Today’s audiences no longer “pay just because there is a celebrity.” No matter how much capital is spent on marketing, it cannot pry open the public’s wallets. In the battle between netizens and capitalists, netizens won again—slapping in the face those who thought they could manipulate box office at will. This film will inevitably become a joke in Chinese cinema history, demonstrating that the market’s ultimate principle is public choice and public opinion—not capital.

Tian Hairong becoming the target of public anger in the Yu Menglong case was no coincidence.

Mainland entertainment critic Song Zude, who has consistently spoken out for Yu Menglong, repeatedly named Tian Hairong on Weibo, exposing that she has certain connections in Beijing. He warned her that “water can carry a boat but can also overturn it” and that justice will eventually come. In the recent “account deletion war,” Song Zude revealed on Weibo that netizens were being suppressed because Tian Hairong’s film was about to be released. His post was deleted within minutes.

Song Zude himself is an industry insider, so he must know some inside information about the case, or he wouldn’t aim directly at Tian Hairong. In addition, in recent days, some netizens revealed that Lin Beichuan had previously clashed with Tian Hairong.

Lin Beichuan’s Weibo from October 17 shows that while in France, he tagged Tian Hairong and said he would visit her in Beijing when he returned.

Lin also posted: “Can you kill me? If you can’t, sooner or later you will be exposed.” “You threw so many scapegoats to shield you, acting so well. What background, what umbrella—everything protects you. From the beginning, it was you isolating and targeting [Yu Menglong]. Otherwise, he wouldn’t have ended up on this path. You know this, don’t you?”

He added: “If one day something happens to me, don’t think you can stay clean.”

From his posts we can infer the following:

First, Lin Beichuan also knows some inside details of the Yu Menglong case. He said Tian Hairong isolated and targeted Yu from the beginning; otherwise, Yu would not have ended up this way. This must be based on solid information. Why would Tian Hairong isolate and target Yu? From the beginning of Yu’s death, many media outlets mentioned that Yu had rejected the “casting couch” advances of a powerful female capital figure and was shelved for three years. Based on Lin’s words, that female capital figure was Tian Hairong.

Second, Tian Hairong has strong political backing and protective umbrellas. Many scapegoats were used to cover for her. Why? Reportedly, Tian Hairong was one of the key organizers in the Yu Menglong entrapment.

Third, Lin said that if something happened to him, Tian couldn’t escape responsibility. This implies that his forced recall to the military is connected to Tian Hairong. Thus, in the recent account-deletion campaigns, troll attacks, smearing of Lin, and forcing him to be recalled, Tian Hairong must have been one of the planners.

To understand Tian Hairong’s connections, we must discuss Xin Qi and his family—also involved in Yu Menglong’s case. It is rumored that Xin Qi is the illegitimate son of Politburo Standing Committee member Cai Qi. He controls Tianyu Media and is the mastermind behind the Yu Menglong incident. His mother Tian Haiyan controls many security companies in Hubei—essentially mafia-like forces with huge power. His nominal father, Xin Bao’an, is chairman of State Grid. Tian Hairong is his aunt. Tian Hairong inherited a huge fortune from her late wealthy husband Xu Ming and invested heavily in film production. The two sisters are called “capital queens.”

Looking at Xin Qi’s resume: at 18 he became a vice-departmental-level cadre of the CCP; at 28 he became vice-ministerial level. This is impossible for someone whose father is only a minister-level cadre.

Recently, new rumors say Xin Qi is actually the illegitimate son of Xi Yuanping, Xi Jinping’s younger brother, because photos before his plastic surgery resemble Xi Yuanping in youth.

It is said Xin Qi has been a huge fan of Yu Menglong since his debut on “Super Boy” in 2013. Yu was born in 1988 and was 25 in 2013.

At this point, the timeline perfectly aligns with the earliest widely circulated video in which Yu Menglong cried desperately: “Since age 25, I’ve been threatened by you all…” Some netizens conducted voiceprint analysis confirming the voice was Yu’s.

Regardless of who Xin Qi is, after Yu’s incident, no matter how many accusations point at him as the direct perpetrator, he remains silent and unseen. Why is he so calm? Aside from having an enormous protective umbrella, there is no other explanation.

(People News Exclusive)